This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Jun 16 01:33:24 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-06-10, at 09.45, Joao Damas wrote: > No, this is not about the point I brought up a few months ago about > management addresses, but rather about what Pekka said, the danger of > putting all the nameservers in a single /24. Any snafu affecting that > /24 (any of the anycast instances flapping, for instance) will take > down access to all servers. Only servers that share the same path. At least if you are referring to dampening. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQM+HSqarNKXTPFCVEQLOpACeKVdPEl45gi9gker0EMNCNIOOKlcAoKy4 Q9hJ55rtLe7JnWXnc+jeTbor =pAXU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]