This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Laura Cobley
laura at ripe.net
Tue Jun 15 17:36:28 CEST 2004
Dear Colleagues, As explained in the email sent on Mon, 14 Jun 2004: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/address-policy-wg/2004/msg00240.html This is the second mail request for clarification of the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy. Below is an excerpt from the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy: 5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria "c)" "To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an organisation must [...] plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organisations to which it will assign /48s by advertising that connectivity through its single aggregated address allocation" LIRs who operate closed/private networks appear not to qualify because the address space in these networks will not be advertised. Was this the community's intention? Best Regards, Laura Cobley Registration Services RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "c)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]