This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Mon Jun 14 14:38:44 CEST 2004
On 14 Jun, 2004, at 14:23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: >> And with regards, to Wilfried's question about whether this policy >> proposal should require the requester to be an LIR, the reply is "why >> should it?". > > To be more precise: not "to be an LIR" but to submit by way of an > LIR" - > much like the distribution of AS numbers. > This sounds right. >> Unlike Daniel, I have trouble seeing bureaucracy as a beautiful >> clockwork mechanism. > > This is not to feed any bloated organisational overhead (no > implication > that there is one in this case!), but rather to avoid digging > administrative bypass tunnels :-) Right, keep things simple. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]