This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Fri Jun 11 10:53:39 CEST 2004
On 11 Jun, 2004, at 10:50, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:47:23AM +0200, Joao Damas wrote: >> Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the >> server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they >> want to anycast? > > This is not my decision. It's up to the working group to decide on the > policy they want to have. That's why I was asking for your opinion. > > The current proposal is a somewhat-balanced compromise, but in no way > cast in stone (yet :) ). It also appears to be under the shadow of the conservation syndrome as this seems to be the only justification to limit the usage of an RFC documented operational procedure. Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Change Request - Allow address allocations for anycast DNS operation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]