This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registration Deadline - RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Nairobi 28 - 30 July 2004
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Lawrence
jon at lawrence.org.uk
Mon Jul 5 14:52:21 CEST 2004
On Friday 02 July 2004 11:17, Chris Cain wrote: > > As a first attempt: > 1. Define a list of interconnect points (NAPS/interconnect exchanges) > This would be fairly strict with only the main interconnect points in > each country qualifying. > > 2. Any entity wanting an allocation must interconnect IPV6 at more than > N > of these points (and be an LIR of course) to qualify for an > allocation. There can't be a requirement to be at an interconnect point. I'm sure there are many ISPs/large enterprises out there that don't use IXP's but take transit directly from numerous providers. Jon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Registration Deadline - RIPE NCC Regional Meeting, Nairobi 28 - 30 July 2004
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]