This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Mon Jul 5 14:35:15 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:17:03AM +0100, Chris Cain wrote:
> 2. Any entity wanting an allocation must interconnect IPV6 at more than
> N
> of these points (and be an LIR of course) to qualify for an
> allocation.
>
> I don't know how the number of allocations would vary with N but a guess
> is that N=2 would be a reasonable number.
Interesting approach, but putting seriously disadvantages on ISPs in
small countries...
(Also, with the current trend in "upstream connectivity gets cheaper
every day", more and more ISPs don't go to IXPs anymore, as it's just
too expensive for a small ISP that's not located nearby to the IXP)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]