[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"

> Maybe the rule should not say "planning to connect 200 organizations" 
but
> rather "will connect x devices within the next 2 years". X has to be
> negotiated. Or, instead of devices, networks. But these are much more 
useful
> numbers. As well for some ISPs (which only 5-20 customers, but these are
> big) as for other organizations, which in the end connect more end-users
> then most ISPs.

In addition to a plan to connect x devices, the applicant should
also be able to demonstrate that they currently have at least
y devices connected to their network. This existing network does
not have to be an IPv4 network, i.e. it could be GSM or some other
technology. The point is that the applicant is a real network
operator today with a real network and they are migrating to
IPv6 technology in some way.

Maybe the number y should be the same as (or similar to) the 
minimum size of a PI allocation. And maybe x should be the
same.

--Michael Dillon