[address-policy-wg] Re: [GLOBAL-V6]IPv6 Policy Proposal for LACNIC Region

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-01-20, at 22.56, Jeff Williams wrote:

>>
>> It is my understanding that the extent of regional differences
>> accomodated in the v6 policy had never been publicly discussed nor
>> stated. All I want to do is clarify this part, which was why I wished
>> to confirm whether there had been any agreement among the RIRs.
>
>   Seems to me from following these ML's that the RIR's staff are
> making or attempting to make policy without any or adequate
> verifiable measured consensus of the participating stakeholders/users.
> I know our members in the different regions feel this way and I have
> ask for but not yet received any confirmation of a demonstrated
> measured consensus documentation from all regions..
>


How many of you members are going to the RIPE meeting next week? How 
many of your members are registered as LIRs in the RIPE region?

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQA4k1aarNKXTPFCVEQKYuwCdEuSz9vYPcw4jXKa46hapn6wT2VkAoMue
vcsiTZrmRnJygAr4YHHuWFUv
=hQdE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----