This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Jan 14 17:17:00 CET 2004
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:02:03PM -0800, Jeff Williams wrote:
> Hans and all,
>
> You are mistaken Hans. It would benefit you and everyone here
> if you would track Apnic a little closer...
Why? We are not APNIC, we are RIPE, and we only make RIPE policies.
So if we send out a formal proposal to change RIPE things to RIPE lists,
and nobody from the RIPE community objects - what's wrong with assuming
consensus, then?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57882 (57753)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] FORMAL PROPOSAL: change of initial PA allocation size
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]