Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Hi,

uh, sorry, this mail was *NOT* supposed to go to the APWG mailing
list.  I bounced it (assuming a CC: was lost) but the whole thing
"escaped" prematurely.  Please *ignore* this e-mail.

gert,
   who will have to buy Andreas a beer in Amsterdam :-o


On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:55:44PM +0100, Andreas Bäß/Denic wrote:
> From: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E4=DF=2FDenic?= <baess at denic.de>
> To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net>
> Subject: Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to
>  allow allocations to critical infrastructure
> Message-ID: <OF6AE716E2.AF0C15C0-ONC1256E1A.006B315B-C1256E1A.006D7A4A at denic.de>
> Resent-From: gert at Space.Net
> Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:11:51 +0100
> Resent-To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:10:24AM +0100, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
> > |   (like "put up 100 servers at various ISP networks, using PA=20
> > |space from those ISPs")
> >=20
> > Is that to be interpreted as a fixed number ?
> > That would make it more difficult to apply this in a smaller country=20
[..]

-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299