[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

chapuis at ip-plus.net (Andre Chapuis) wrote:

> Agreed,
> And what about defining an address-range where every ISP opens its filter up to /29 (as an example) ? This would deal with both anycast and address-space conservation.
> Let's show that we (as ISPs) are not bound to the /24 forever !

Nice idea. You try convincing the Tier-1s (and -wannabes).
I second this thought, but I deem it impractical, since the "big players"
will be hard to convince to change their filtering boundaries.

I believe, some answers will be in the style of "who's RIPE anyway?".

Yours,
	Elmar.


-- 

  Es gibt Luegen, verdammte Luegen und RIPE-141(-219)-Netzantraege.
							(mlelstv, dcii 2003)

-----------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---