[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

|I suggested:
|--------------------------
| - Anycast deployment

OK - I want to do anycast for my server - so I qualify.

| - multiple distributed servers bring benefits for the whole community

so - I need more than one server to do this, that is slikgltyl limiting ths
from beeing available to everybody.

How is "bring benefits for the whole community" different from "critical
infrastructure" ?
I agree the first is a slightly better definition, but how do we measure
this criteria ?
Or is it a judgemental criteria to be evaluated by the RIPE NCC ?

| - due to protocol limitations this cannot be done using other approaches

so you will have an argument on wether the mecahnisms in the DNS protocol
are good enouugh to create redundancy.

|   (like "put up 100 servers at various ISP networks, using PA 
|space from
|   those ISPs")

Is that to be interpreted as a fixed number ?
That would make it more difficult to apply this in a smaller country like
Norway (where do I find ISP % 95...) that in for instance germany ?


-hph