Antwort: Re: [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

> - There seems to be no need for a special policy regarding IP Blocks
>    used for anycast. Some status value ASSIGNED ANYCAST would be nice,
>    but i guess, we need no policy
> 
> - This whole issue is rather about Nameservers. xxTLD operators can't
>    justify something like a /24 in IPv4 or /32 in IPv6 just for one
>    nameserver glue record.
>    Most other people thinking about deploying anycast services most
>    likely have other needs or even other means of acquiring address space
>    which is routable globally

could you explain why, other than socially, the needs and resources
of tld operators are different than those of anyone else deploying
globally available services?

randy