[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

gert at space.net (Gert Doering) wrote:

> > Therefore we agree. What if DENIC changes its proposal to "critical
> > resource *and* using anycasting"?
> 
> I said so in the beginning: if the focus is on "anycast", I'll happy
> to support the proposal.

I believe that your argumentation holds; "critical infrastructure" is
something very personal, and "public"...what's public? Isn't google
a public service, too? Or Yahoo? Or ebay? Or ...

I favour concentrating on the anycast argument, I think, the best we
could do is an allocation block from which all "anycast assignments"
can be made (thus not filtering beyond /24s from this block would
be easier) and it would of course be perfect, if CCTLDs joined each
other in hosting anycast boxes. Well, at least it'd be nice...

Yours,
	Elmar.

-- 

  Es gibt Luegen, verdammte Luegen und RIPE-141(-219)-Netzantraege.
							(mlelstv, dcii 2003)

-----------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---