[address-policy-wg] Re: RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:40:16AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> because denic is so <blank> as to be unable to find an old unused
> swamp C, does not imply that global allocation policy needs to be
> changed.

I don't think this is the issue.  They want to do Anycast, and want to
do it in an official and documented way, so people can easily see 
what's going on, without resorting to "find a swamp C" network.

That's why I'm in favour to have a policy that permits allocations for
specific, well-defined Anycast services.  That allocations would come
from a well-known block, so people would know to not filter /24s from
there (and so on).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299