[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:14:12PM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Gert Doering wrote:
> > I would be happy to sacrifice one routing table entry per ccTLD, though,
> > if it increases reliability of the whole DNS system.  Speaking for my 
> > network only, of course.
> 
> .. until someone figures out that, hey, each ccTLD actually requires
> more entries (e.g., 3), because having just one prefix for all the
> servers increases the danger/threat of a routing system hiccup for a
> prefix..

Those entries would be for the anycast servers.

There's nothing wrong with having 8 other servers hosted at some ISPs,
happily using PA addresses out of the corresponding ISP's PA space, 
and not needing a single routing table entry.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  57882  (57753)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299