This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Wed Feb 25 08:55:13 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> What Daniel is suggesting is a more pro-active approach on behalf of >> the >> RIR's. The advantage is that it may reach those who normally would not >> even be aware that they have an issue. > > Whilst a proactive approach is a good idea, is it really the RIR's > position to > do this ? As has been said previously, it's not the RIR's > responsibility to > ensure routability of IP addtresses this must lie with the various > ISP's. I don't think that what Daniel is proposing has anything to do with ensuring routability. It is simply a means to visualize where you might encoutner problems. Best regards, - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQDxU5aarNKXTPFCVEQKmaQCg0JfM2tzrWzs3d0Zu1iDBhp4kkwMAn04s D88NuNdzGaECxat388nlrBVk =5cNc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]