[address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: De-boganising New Address Blocks

On 24.02 19:41, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> > What Daniel is suggesting is a more pro-active approach on behalf of the
> > RIR's. The advantage is that it may reach those who normally would not
> > even be aware that they have an issue.
> 
> Whilst a proactive approach is a good idea, is it really the RIR's position to 
> do this ? As has been said previously, it's not the RIR's responsibility to 
> ensure routability of IP addtresses this must lie with the various ISP's.

I note that explicitly in my draft. If there are many ISPs opposed to the RIRs
doing this we will gladly not do it and point those experiencing connectivity
problems because of false positive matches on out-dated bogon filters to the fact
that our community does not want us to do anything about it pro-actively. ;-(

Daniel