This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Fri Aug 20 14:43:24 CEST 2004
>Well, clearly ICANN and the U.S. watch the IANA because the IANA >an activity which the DOC subcontracts to ICANN to perform. Exactly. > The IANA is not an organization and it has no independent status. It >just happens to be the historical name for some of the functions of ICANN Exactly. >so for convenience and clarity, the name remains assigned to that set of >functions. For clarification read this contract that ICANN has signed with >the DOC on behalf of the U.S. Government. Indeed. And given the world, some governments, and ICANN as they are these days, I (personally) do not consider that structure to be the most stable and resilient setup that I'd rather have in place to control global resource distribution. Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]