This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Wed Aug 11 11:12:15 CEST 2004
Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:39:20PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote: > > I read it that IANA don't see RIR's needing more than a /12 in a 36 month > > period - thus a /12 would at least meet the RIR's needs for the next 36 > > months. > > > > Seems like a much better idea than faffing about handing out a /23 every few > > months. > > i'll be blunt. this apnic proposal is still the same geoff and paul > land grab. with the doubling algorithm, the proposal would have all of > ipv6 space to the rirs in a few short years. "if they manage to get 50% of it distributed to their LIRs". What makes you assume that this will happen? If I look at the IPv4 address distribution rules of the past 5 years, the trend was clearly towards being more and more conservative. Given the (current) IPv6 policy, I hardly see a way to get a /8 filled (this would be 2^24 /32s, and even 2^12=4096 /20s, which is roughly the number of members the RIRs have - and most of them will certainly not qualify for a /20 any time soon). > they failed to get all of fp=001 allocated to the rirs in a block, RIPE-261 actually had some clever ideas behind (the binary chop algorithm to make sure even the largest ISPs only need one single v6 prefix), but was refused from the community for other reasons (people wanted to *see* which region a prefix belongs to). A large part of the community seems to be trusting the RIRs a *lot* more than ICANN, btw. > so have a new way to get it in > a few pieces. given that fp=001 is supposed to last decades, and we > don't know decades of internet governance (what once used to be called > stewardship) reliability, this seems unwise. So am I right in interpreting this as "as we don't know whether the way forward is the right way, let's stop moving altogether"? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 65398 (60210) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]