This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nils Ketelsen
nils at steering-group.net
Tue Aug 10 14:21:32 CEST 2004
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:55:04AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > If you want to go with /12s, hand out the /12 per RIR *now*. Fully, > without any "reservation". /8s would be better. Repeat the mistakes done in IPv4, only this time by assigning everything to the RIRs instead of directly to the user? Good plan. Has nobody learned from the mistaked made in the past? We can not say if there will be another assigment policy then IANA->RIR->LIR in maybe 20 or 30 years (thats the time IPv6 has a realistic chance to gain real speed). Then the RIRs sit on their /8s wihtout really needing it just like the organizations that got direct assignments today. Nils -- "Wenn alle Stricke reißen, dann häng ich mich auf!" [So gesehen an einer Toilettenwand]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]