This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jon Lawrence
jon at lawrence.org.uk
Mon Aug 9 23:46:23 CEST 2004
On Monday 09 August 2004 18:42, Randy Bush wrote: > leo, > > can you explain why the rirs need a time window from the iana > (36 months) so much larger than lirs need from the rirs? > > randy Randy, I read it that IANA don't see RIR's needing more than a /12 in a 36 month period - thus a /12 would at least meet the RIR's needs for the next 36 months. Seems like a much better idea than faffing about handing out a /23 every few months. Jon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy for allocation of IPv6 address space from IANA to RIRs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]