This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Apr 23 15:06:09 CEST 2004
> The approach is interesting. "Since getting public address space > means 'lots of work in making a proper address plan', we just > grab 3 full /8s". > > So how to proceed? spend time from now to meeting doing productive (i.e. other) things. at meeting, give it five minutes on the agenda, just in case there is something not obvious and useful hidden in this. after meeting, get back to productive work. > Is this an IETF working group (-backed) thing, or just a private > draft? Should there be a formal RIR response? Is this RIR > business, or ICANN/AC/ASO business? I'm a bit confused about the > politics here. who cares? why care? any idiot can publish an internet-daft; i myself demonstrated this many times until harold fired me and i got a life. judge it on its merits, or lack thereof. imiho, it has no merit. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]