[address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:

>   Or should I just read this draft (on top of some other MByte of stuff
>   that should be read ;-)

Its only a short draft, but I'm in disbelief that "A number of
organizations have expanded their autonomous private networks to the point
of exhausting the address space identified in RFC 1918"

Sounds more like poor / lazy / classful subnetting to me, of which the 
cure is is not allocating another 3 /8's of otherwise usuable globally 
unique IP space.

We already have 10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16, 169.254/16, 192.0.2/24. If 
these 18 million IPs aren't enough for an enterprises internal usage, I'm 
amazed.

Regards
James