[address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Request Forms: updated and available on LIR Portal

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:00:03PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
[..]
> > Don't get me wrong. I'm talking about a special case here, respectively
> > about detailed information as in "equipment specs, model number...ect."
> > as well as stuff like "network plans".
> 
> I think the criteria to reveal your network plan has been there since RIPE
> 185  and even before that.

The network *plan*, yes, but that was mostly unspecific, like "this is
the office network, 100 PCs", without having to prove more detail.

[..]
> I wonder if somebody can point me to when documenting the
> make, model and version became a generic requirement to get address space
> became part of the policy.
> 
> (Yes I know I have said in (private) conversations that IF this
> information is a requirement is part of the policy THEN it should be part
> of the form.)

I agree with you - if it is policy, then it has to be asked by the form.

On the other hand, as for the IPv6 thing, I oppose asking for very
fine details that are really not *that* relevant, except for cases that 
warrant an exception from the usual rules (like in the classful context 
that you've quoted).

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  55575  (56535)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299