This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell
bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Oct 28 20:04:52 CET 2003
In a message written on Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:50:10PM -0800, Jeff Williams wrote: > I also am in agreement with Leo on this point as well. IPv8 is already > in significant deployment asia and elsewhere and is in some folks > opinion, though I am sure not Michael's, a superior IP Protocol to > IPv6, which has known Privacy problems. This was already brought up on PPML, but since another list is copied here I'll say it again. I had _NO_ idea there was an IPv8 proposal out there. I know nothing about it, don't support it, and don't care. s/IPv8/IPvFuture/ in my message please, that was my only intention. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request at tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20031028/cc753d1b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]