This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michel Py
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
Mon Oct 27 18:13:29 CET 2003
> Andre Oppermann wrote: > The problem with IPv6 is that it doesn't fix any problems. When > IPv6 was engineered it was done with (from today's perspective) > wrong assumptions about the goals to achieve. Think about > multihoming for IPv6 which is currently not possible (except > for ISPs). And much more stuff on the operational side. Much agree with this. Michel.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] re: Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]