This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Questions on Provider Independent IPv4 addresses,
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on Provider Independent IPv4 addresses,
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on Provider Independent IPv4 addresses,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
leo vegoda
leo at ripe.net
Fri Oct 17 15:37:39 CEST 2003
Hi Thomas, Thomas.Levy at alcatel.fr wrote: >Hello, > >I read with interest the ripe-234 document on IPv4 address allocation. >It raised me the following questions on PI addresses: >1) Usage of PI addresses is not recommended by RIPE. I don't want to raise a debate on this >point. However, I would be interested in knowing the reasons for this. Is it for routing >purpose? >2) How could I find statistics on PI allocated addresses (by RIPE or globally)? The why of PI assignments is an ongoing discussion. There has been some discussion on the <pi-tf at ripe.net> list which was followed up on this list. The <pi-tf at ripe.net> list archives can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/pi-tf/ I prepared some statistics on PI assignments in a summary of the PI TF discussions. You can find them at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/address-policy-wg/2003/msg00030.html I hope this is helpful for you. Best regards, -- leo vegoda RIPE NCC Registration Services Manager
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on Provider Independent IPv4 addresses,
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Questions on Provider Independent IPv4 addresses,
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]