This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] re: Is the time for conservation over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Nov 4 10:35:13 CET 2003
Hi, On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:18:32PM +0000, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: > The key to avoiding the mistakes of history is to forget about > conserving address space. It is not a scarce resource; we have > lots of it. Strongly seconded. But I observe that this is very hard to get into people's minds ("640 kbyte are enough for everyone", "don't repeat mistakes from the past", "don't start wasting IPv6 address space before we know how much we'll need!"). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 57386 (57785) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Is the time for conservation over?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Is the time for conservation over?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]