This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] WG Charter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG Charter
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
'Daniel Karrenberg'
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Sun Aug 31 23:33:57 CEST 2003
On 31.08 16:44, Ray Plzak wrote: > > 2. IANA does not exist as an organization. ICANN performs the IANA > functions under a contract with the US DoC. There is nothing to > preclude any other organization to perform all or part of this function. > Under the current circumstances that could be either as a subcontractor > to ICANN under the current contract or as a separate contractor to the > US DoC. > > Point 2 has some interesting scenarios if looked at in the long run. I read that to mean that you are in agreement with my suggestion. Correct? Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] WG Charter
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE NCC Services
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]