This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Aug 19 21:08:08 CEST 2003
Daniele, > I stand 100% with Daniel here. I can't speak for the others RIRs but I > strongly believe the RIPE-NCC has made significant efforts in the > recent past to listen to its membership, streamline procedures, and > positively react to constructive criticism. I think it a bit to early to start claiming progress. Quality have improved, but I think want a bit more before I start jumping up and down of joy. > There is more work to do, no doubt about it, but I can't see how > flaming on mailing lists helps. Agreed. > > Whomever has concrete ideas: I propose we move this discussion to the > ncc-services-wg list/group, that was created exactly for this purpose. Agreed! - kurtis -
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]