[address-policy-wg] Summary of the PI Task Force's recent discussions

> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:00:02AM +0100,
> >  Carlos Friacas <cfriacas at fccn.pt> wrote
> >  a message of 29 lines which said:
> >
> > > > If all non-US-ccTLD registries (of which there are lots more than
> > > > US-based) start beating ICANN with joint forces, I'm pretty sure that
> > > > this will have an effect.
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried serious reasoning with them about these delays???
>
> I have raised the question to the ASO address council and ICANN
> coordination list.
>
> I'll get back to the WG with the response and we can discuss a
> constructive approach to solve this.

I have been in touch with ICANN staff regarding this, and from what I
understand there are no open requests with IANA from the two previously
mentioned ccTLDs. I got yet another example by private email, but it was
from 2 years back.

There is however an open request to add IPv6 addres recors to the
root-zone. On this matter ICANN have asked for technical advice from the
root server advisory group and are currently awaiting this advice before
proceeding.

If you have problems with the response time from IANA in such matters
please first contact IANA staff with the ticketing number in question.

Eventaly the CcNSO will be the forum to address such issues, until then
feel free to contact me to use whatever connections I have with ICANN to
solve operational problems.

I hope this helps,

Best Regards,
Hans Petter Holen