[address-policy-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation

>
>I disagree. Your customer should request a seperate "SUB-ALLOCATED PA"
>block for his customer or otherwise if he want's to look like being
>independent to his customer, he should become RIPE member. I hardly
>can't see advantages of making sub-sub-allocations (maybe you could
>point them out?).

Oh i wish i had access to my old mail that i sent to this list. There is an 
argument for this but i fits the multi-national internet registry (MIR) 
structure much better. It is not necessarily for your customer but more a 
way of trying to control your internal routing tables. Does anyone have a 
copy of the MIR proposal they could repost. Which may help explain.

Regards
Stephen Burley
Internet Communications consultant
Africonnect