[address-policy-wg] Re: ICANN vs RIPE NCC, was Re: Summary of the PI ......

On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Peter Galbavy wrote:

> Stephen Burley wrote:
> > 1.registry services (good and timely)
> > 2. database repository (and related DB functions)
> > 3. Training services (mainly for new LIR's to get them up to speed)
> > 4. RIPE meeting organization
> 
> I agree with 1-3. I think 4 should be a "spare time" activity or one
> organised by an EU Internet "club". If 4 can be done part time by *one*
> person, then I am happy to pay for my part of the time.

i agree with 1+2+4.  3 should be covered on a cost basis by the attendees.
if the cost of a training session is 5000euro (room, lunch, instructor
time, etc) and 25 attend, then the cost should be 200euro per attendee,
with no affect on the overall ncc budget. 

> 
> Peter
> 

Hank Nussbacher