[acm-tf] Rationale for reporting abuse

Hi all,
the rationale of a policy proposal, according to the RIPE Policy
Proposal Template, consists of two lists of arguments, pros and cons.
 For example, Tobias' 2010-08 lists some arguments, apparently
assuming that everybody else knows what abuse is going to be reported
to whom and why.  Is such assumption correct?

AFAIK, Thunderbird and Outlook don't have a "Report-as-Spam" button,
yet.  The abuse-report flow that our policy aims to support is not yet
clearly established.  So, I propose that we put together some text
that describes the abuse-reporting perspective in general.  It will be
much more straightforward to analyze the requirements of abuse contact
management on that basis.  The text itself can later be incorporated
into the draft document.

Shall we do it?  I'd love to see some +/-1s about this...