[acm-tf] Functionality

I can see both use cases as possibles - where you'd specify an abuse@
for a whole ASN, and for individual CIDRs.

In practice abuse issues that are routed to the abuse contact for the
ASN owner are likely to land two or three levels (at least) upstream
of the actual entity whose abuse team is the right POC.

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Peter Koch <pk at denic.de> wrote:
>
> If aut-num was going to allow a link to $object, the expectations for
> both publishers and users need to be clearly documented.  Currently
> my imagination doesn't help me to link an "abuse" case to an AS rather than
> address space (or really, the route).  Of course, announcing a
> wrong prefix might fall into this category, but then that would be
> an operational matter (read: "tech-c") to start with.



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)