[acm-tf] Functionality

+1 to tobias.

Can we now knock together a proposal  for this and submit it for rough
consensus?

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Tobias Knecht <tk at abusix.com> wrote:
>
> I feel very comfotable about the name abuse-c, because everybody
> understands that "c" means contact as it does in admin-c and tech-c
> already. Publishers and Users.
>
> I think it is more the function of the database people to decide on a
> name for the final object. As Denis explained to me, we could use a
> special type of object like an IRT Object or database people could
> decide to use a role object with special rules around.



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)