[acm-tf] some thoughts on issues raised today
Denis Walker denis at ripe.net
Fri Jun 17 18:58:57 CEST 2011
On 16/06/11:25 9:12 PM, Tobias Knecht wrote: > Hi all, > > I really like the new idea of Denis and from my perspective we should > not discuss about it to much, since RIPE NCC Database Group will be > responsible for developing the "product" at the end. Just to avoid any misunderstandings, the RIPE NCC is happy to suggest technical implementation ideas and advise on data model design issues and take on the responsibility for developing the end product, as long as it fits in with the requirements and policies determined by the Task Force. > > I think the concerns from yesterdays call that are mentioned by Denis > are solved in a pretty smart way. Aren't they? > > >> abuse-mailbox: >> e-mail: >> phone: >> irc: >> url: >> im: Before we get too carried away with these 'attributes', they were just a random set of imaginary names I used to illustrate the idea. Since this design is easily extended we can introduce new contact method attributes to be used in any type of ROLE object whenever the community feels the need for one. regards denis > > Since we do not know, which channels other than email are used at them > moment I would keep it simple and just use the typical attributes for a > STANDARD object and add the abuse-mailbox attribute and an url attribute. > > We should start with a small list and add things when they are needed to > avoid unneeded discussions and keep it simple. If there are suggestions > coming from the community we can add them or add other attributes later > as they show up. > > Any suggestions or concerns about this? > > > > Thanks, > > Tobias > > >
[ Acm-tf Archives ]