[Accountability-tf] Updated Draft Report - Comments Requested

Thanks for the excellent work.
My comments to a couple points below.

On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:56, Antony Gollan <agollan at ripe.net> wrote:


>
> 2. Should we make changes based on Jim Reid's feedback?
> a) We are having trouble understanding how we could describe what each
> structure is accountable for beyond the various roles we have identified
> in the tables. We could make more high level comments - but to some
> extent this is already done in the introductions for each of the tables.
>


> b) We are not sure how to take his comment that recommending that the
> community consider a single WG Chair selection process is out of scope
> for the TF
>

I support a single WG Chair selection process.
I have been suggesting this to the wg-chairs for a while now.
I would put this on the table as soon as the RIPE Chair process is done.


3. The new RIPE Chair document seems problematic for the document in a
> couple of ways:
> a) We currently have a recommendation that the RIPE Chair should report
> back to the community on his activities - but the new document says "The
> RIPE chair reports their actions to the community as appropriate." Does
> this mean we should remove this recommendation?
>

The RIPE Chair document documents what we belive is the current practice of
the RIPE Chair.
You are welcome to propose improvements, (and I have intended to publish a
report to the
community regularly)
-- 
Sincerely,
Hans Petter Holen - hph at oslo.net - +47 45066054
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/accountability-tf/attachments/20190125/77a586db/attachment.html>