[Accountability-tf] Updated Accountability Document
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexander Isavnin isavnin at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 23:08:19 CEST 2019
Dear William, Colleagues! I find this document acceptable, reasonable to be published. We are no longer able to work on this document, i think we already put all our possible attitude to RIPE and accountability into this document. My suggestion is to add list of TF Members/Authors, collaborators, contributors to this document (opt in?). Future generations need to see who are accountable for accountability document. (Like for RIPE-001, for example) Even i am not pleased completely with this document, i support it's publication. My main disagreement is the slow introduction to RIPE where main objective (about pan-european, nowdays global IP connectivity) is stated only in 5th paragraph. But anyway, i agree with publication of this document. I am glad, that i had possibility to work closely with all of you, hope together we can do even more for RIPE! Special thanks goes to Willliam as our chair, Malcolm for his marvelous wordings, Antony for paperwork, and for sure all survived and retired task force members! Best regards, Alexander Isavnin вт, 19 мар. 2019 г. в 18:59, William Sylvester <william.sylvester at addrex.net>: > > TF Members, > > > > Here is the revised accountability document. Please review and provide approvals, we would like to share this with the ripe-list as soon as we can achieve consensus. > > > > What has changed in this version: > > > > The recommendations were numbered, they now correspond with the recommendations in the back of the document. > The RIPE Chair table (1.0) contains the roles in the updated ripe-174 document that was published after our review. “Not reviewed” was added along with a note in the introductory table. > We will want to remove the “Draft” off the title page and add a date when published to the community. > Malcom’s comments were considered but did not need to be incorporated. > > > > In regards to other feedback, we have determined that the task force recommendations for the alignment of WG chair is in scope and have retained this within the document. > > > > Thank you all for your review and I look forward to your comments and approval of the document. > > > > Thanks, > > > > William > > Accountability Task Force Chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]