[Accountability-tf] Preamble to "Rough Consensus" doc
Carsten Schiefner ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue Feb 6 10:24:35 CET 2018
What I have forgotten to mention last night: On 05.02.2018 22:03, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > as agreed earlier today, please find attached my addition of a preamble > to Malcolm's initial draft of the doc he has send around attached to his > email cited below. feel free to bash it where necessary, of course! :-) > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Accountability-tf] Proposed Accountability TF Call Monday > 4-Dec @ 14:00 UTC+1 > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:49:53 +0000 > From: Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> > To: William Sylvester <william.sylvester at addrex.net>, Accountability TF > <accountability-tf at ripe.net> > > [...] > > Secondly, please find attached a first straw man draft of "Rough > Consensus at RIPE", a discussion of what rough consensus means and the > implications of using it. > > Further apologies for not having done this weeks ago. Pressures of work, > of course. > > It's mostly "complete", in the sense there's only two sections I planned > to write that I haven't started yet ("the critical role of the Chair" > and "comparisons with IETF"). There may be more topics I haven't thought > of; please let me know. > > Of course, as to the core of the paper, there may be additional > categories of objections that can properly be disregarded in a consensus > call, beyond those I have identified. Please let me know, or craft > additional text yourselves. > > I hope you find it a useful contribution. > > [...]