[Accountability-tf] RIPE Accountability Task Force Call Today, 2-3pm

Filiz, all,

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:19:05PM +0100, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:

> Agreed. Looking into how PDP is used and the consistency of its
> application across RIPE fits into our scope, as well as explaining
> when and how not using the full PDP gets chosen, why imo.

thanks.

> > The PDP itself and its implementation as well as the role of the
> > chairs and their (s)election could be an item for this TF.
> 
> Maybe I am mis-reading your suggestion but the implementation is done
> by the RIPE NCC. Do you mean we should also look into how the NCC
> implements a policy that is accepted by the Community?

What I meant was the particular "instance" of the PDP itself, not
the result and the execution/application by the NCC.

> > The most recent changes in the DB WG as well as the heterogeneity
> > of rules might serve as starting points.

> Can you elaborate on this? What are these changes you are referring to
> in the DB WG?
> I have not followed this issue closely and maybe some others do not
> know about it either.

Not being flippant but only to avoid adding confusion by just paraphrasing,
here's the summary <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-December/005480.html>
One might want to read a bit up-/down-thread.

Consensus building around personnel decisions (or general yes/no
questions) might turn out to be difficult.

Best,
  Peter