[Accountability-tf] RIPE Accountability Task Force Call Today, 2-3pm

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Peter Koch <pk at denic.de> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:46:09AM +0100, Antony Gollan wrote:
>
>> 20163011-1: Task force members to each come up with a few topics they
>> want the Task Force to address and share this on the mailing list.
>
> one of the important tasks of the RIPE community is to set policy,
> mostly for the NCC to execute. Policy is guided by the PDP and
> steered by the chairs of the working groups concerned.
>

Agreed. Looking into how PDP is used and the consistency of its
application across RIPE fits into our scope, as well as explaining
when and how not using the full PDP gets chosen, why imo.

(S)election of WG Chairs and their terms, how TFs are called out, how
WGs are accepted or closed, how meeting scheduling takes place are
other topics we may want to look deeper too.

> The PDP itself and its implementation as well as the role of the
> chairs and their (s)election could be an item for this TF.

Maybe I am mis-reading your suggestion but the implementation is done
by the RIPE NCC. Do you mean we should also look into how the NCC
implements a policy that is accepted by the Community?

> The most recent changes in the DB WG as well as the heterogeneity
> of rules might serve as starting points.
>

Can you elaborate on this? What are these changes you are referring to
in the DB WG?
I have not followed this issue closely and maybe some others do not
know about it either.


Cheers
Filiz


> -Peter
>
>