[techsec-wg] Re: [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
-
To: Doug Barton <>
-
From: David Conrad <>
-
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:10:45 -0800
-
Cc: Jaap Akkerhuis <>, ,
On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
David Conrad wrote:
NEW ATTACK TECHNIQUE THREATENS BROADBAND USERS
...
As noted, dnssec can protect against spoofed dns info.
Except DNSSEC wouldn't really be applicable.
It would apply in the (theoretical) subset of applications that are
configured to rely on signed and validated responses, like hopefully
windows/osx/mozilla/other software updaters could be configured to do.
The question is how do they get the information that the data has
been signed and the signatures validated. Since with this attack
they'd be going through a compromised server, they lose. The only
way out of that hole is if you run a local validating caching server
and have appropriate (out-of-band validated) trust anchors configured
and if you're running a local caching server, you're already not
susceptible to the attack.
Rgds,
-drc
|