Re: [ipv6-wg] Proposal for new charter: Version 2

["S.P.Zeidler" spz@localhost]

Hi Shane,

Thus wrote Shane Kerr (shane@localhost):

>  Hopefully
> it is not too long:

14 lines.. that should fit most terminals in one page ;-P

>       * I added a slightly modified activity based on David's last new
>         one. His was "propose solutions for operational issues". I would
>         rather see this as a more general discussion of operational
>         issues - presumably solutions will be proposed where
>         appropriate. If we want to focus on solutions, then we can
>         revert to David's idea about proposing solutions.

I think 'discussion' is better than focussing on 'solutions' only,
because sometimes you don't have a solution, but only the choice
which bear trap to stick your foot in, and knowing there is such
a trade ahead can be very valuable indeed.

In short, I like. :)

regards,
	spz
-- 
spz@localhost (S.P.Zeidler)