Re: [6bone] RE: [ipv6-wg@localhost] Update on IPv6 filter recommendation

[Bill Manning <]

% > 
% > 	there has never been a requirement that a prefix berouted or
% > 	announced on the "Internet".
% 
% In that case why does an ISP have to:
% 
% 5.1.1.d: have a plan for making at least 200 /48 assignments to other
% organisations within two years.
% See: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6policy.html
% 
% -Hank

	One might ask Ripe... :)
	Of course, even if an entity does execute on its plan and 
	makes at least 2002 /48 assignments to other organisations,
	what requirement is there that they (in toto) route/announce
	this prefix to anyone else?

--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).