Maillist Archive: enum-wg@ripe.net/2009

All Archives / enum-wg / 2009 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

• 07 November 2009
  • [enum-wg] Query statistics Eduardo Júnior
• 02 November 2009
  • [enum-wg] ENUM - do you trust the other guy? are you ready to go without DNSSEC? Rui Ribeiro
• 29 October 2009
  • [enum-wg] Re: RIPE 59: DRAFT minutes ENUM WG Niall O'Reilly
• 29 October 2009
  • [enum-wg] Could Web 2.0 be the killer application for ENUM? Rui Ribeiro
• 13 October 2009
  • RE: [enum-wg] and now Sprint...??? Richard Shockey
  • Re: [enum-wg] and now Sprint...??? Torsten Schlabach
• 12 October 2009
  • [enum-wg] and now Sprint...??? Richard Shockey
• 07 October 2009
  • [enum-wg] Start of the ENUM WG session at RIPE 59 on Friday Carsten Schiefner
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? Carsten Schiefner
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? Torsten Schlabach
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? Carsten Schiefner
• 04 October 2009
  • [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service??? Richard Shockey
• 21 September 2009
  • [enum-wg] Agenda for ENUM-WG at RIPE 59 Niall O'Reilly
• 08 September 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] issues with tinnie.arin.net? Sjoerd Oostdijck
  • [enum-wg] issues with tinnie.arin.net? Alexander Mayrhofer
• 04 September 2009
  • [enum-wg] Second call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda Carsten Schiefner
• 02 September 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available Carsten Schiefner
• 27 August 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes? Florian Weimer
  • [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes? Carsten Schiefner
  • [enum-wg] First call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda Carsten Schiefner
• 28 July 2009
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter? Christian de Larrinaga
  • [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available Carsten Schiefner
• 27 July 2009
  • [enum-wg] CRUE Jim Reid
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Christian de Larrinaga
• 22 July 2009
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter? peter
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Carsten Schiefner
• 19 July 2009
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Christian de Larrinaga
• 18 July 2009
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Carsten Schiefner
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Carsten Schiefner
• 09 July 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS? Yoshiro YONEYA
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Torsten Schlabach
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS? Richard Shockey
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS? Torsten Schlabach
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS? Richard Shockey
  • [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS? Yoshiro YONEYA
• 08 July 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Otmar Lendl
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Stream Service
• 07 July 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Rui Ribeiro
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Stream Service
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Rui Ribeiro
  • AW: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Christoph Künkel
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Torsten Schlabach
• 06 July 2009
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Otmar Lendl
  • [enum-wg] DNSSEC for 1.3.e164.arpa Antoin Verschuren
• 03 July 2009
  • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter? Otmar Lendl