Archive: enum-wg@ripe.net/2009

All Archives / enum-wg / 2009 / Author | Chronological | Subject | Thread

Page 1

-1-    >>>

Page 3

• [enum-wg] Query statistics, Eduardo Júnior (07 November 2009)
• [enum-wg] ENUM - do you trust the other guy? are you ready to go without DNSSEC?, Rui Ribeiro (02 November 2009)
• [enum-wg] Re: RIPE 59: DRAFT minutes ENUM WG, Niall O'Reilly (29 October 2009)
• [enum-wg] Could Web 2.0 be the killer application for ENUM?, Rui Ribeiro (29 October 2009)
• [enum-wg] Start of the ENUM WG session at RIPE 59 on Friday, Carsten Schiefner (07 October 2009)
• [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service???, Richard Shockey (04 October 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service???, Carsten Schiefner (07 October 2009)
    • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service???, Torsten Schlabach (07 October 2009)
      • Re: [enum-wg] British Telecom ENUM service???, Carsten Schiefner (07 October 2009)
    • [enum-wg] and now Sprint...???, Richard Shockey (12 October 2009)
      • Re: [enum-wg] and now Sprint...???, Torsten Schlabach (13 October 2009)
      • RE: [enum-wg] and now Sprint...???, Richard Shockey (13 October 2009)
• [enum-wg] Agenda for ENUM-WG at RIPE 59, Niall O'Reilly (21 September 2009)
• [enum-wg] issues with tinnie.arin.net?, Alexander Mayrhofer (08 September 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] issues with tinnie.arin.net?, Sjoerd Oostdijck (08 September 2009)
• [enum-wg] Second call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda, Carsten Schiefner (04 September 2009)
• [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes?, Carsten Schiefner (27 August 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] regular statistics also on non-delegated E.164 country codes?, Florian Weimer (27 August 2009)
• [enum-wg] First call for RIPE 59 ENUM WG agenda, Carsten Schiefner (27 August 2009)
• [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available, Carsten Schiefner (28 July 2009)
  • Re: [enum-wg] DRAFT Minutes of ENUM-WG session at RIPE 58 are available, Carsten Schiefner (02 September 2009)
• Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter?, peter (22 July 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter?, Christian de Larrinaga (28 July 2009)
• [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS?, Yoshiro YONEYA (09 July 2009)
  • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS?, Richard Shockey (09 July 2009)
    • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS?, Torsten Schlabach (09 July 2009)
      • RE: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS?, Richard Shockey (09 July 2009)
    • Re: [enum-wg] ENUM for SMS?, Yoshiro YONEYA (09 July 2009)
• [enum-wg] DNSSEC for 1.3.e164.arpa, Antoin Verschuren (06 July 2009)
• [#XMS-873473]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Stream Service (03 July 2009)
• [#SUL-477848]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Stream Service (03 July 2009)
• [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Stream Service (30 June 2009)
  • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Florian Weimer (30 June 2009)
    • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Antoin Verschuren (30 June 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Florian Weimer (30 June 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Rui Ribeiro (30 June 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Florian Weimer (01 July 2009)
      • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Antoin Verschuren (01 July 2009)
      • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Antoin Verschuren (01 July 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Rui Ribeiro (01 July 2009)
      • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Antoin Verschuren (01 July 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Marian Ďurkovič (02 July 2009)
      • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Antoin Verschuren (02 July 2009)
      • Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Marco Sommani (02 July 2009)
      • RE: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?, Esther Makaay (03 July 2009)