A problem may be in the formulation: "Every TSP in
Poland".
Is that in compliance with EU regulations
for fair cross-border competition ?
Lothar
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: enum-wg-admin@localhost [mailto:enum-wg-admin@localhost]
Gesendet: Samstag, 11. Dezember 2004 18:28
An: Andrzej Bartosiewicz; Carsten Schiefner
Betreff: Re:
[enum-wg] COCOM & ENUM ...
>BTW: Access to the production system is restricted to
the TSPs with
>officially assigned numering
blocks by "Office of Telecommunications
>and Post
Regulation" in Poland.
There is only one "minor" problem with the implementation in Poland:
It is Carrier E**M in e164.arpa -richard
________________________________
Von: enum-wg-admin@localhost im Auftrag von Andrzej
Bartosiewicz
Gesendet: Sa 11.12.2004 16:55
An: Carsten Schiefner
Cc:
enum-wg@localhost
Betreff: Re: [enum-wg] COCOM &
ENUM ...
Carsten,
The answer is: Yes. We have switched over to production 6
months ago. You missed my presentation in Sophia Antipolis... :)
Every TSP in Poland with assigned numbering block may sign
the contract with NASK and start the registration of ENUM domain names in
8.4.e164.arpa (5 EURO/year).
BTW: Access to the production system is restricted to the
TSPs with officially assigned numering blocks by "Office of
Telecommunications and Post Regulation" in Poland. We also have the
"testing" system, so everybody (not only TSPs) can test the full
functionality. The only difference is that we do not export domain names to
zone file from the "testing" system.
Andrzej.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> thanks for the link - on p. 4 it reads: "Production
registry launch:
> May 19, 2004".
>
> Did I completely miss a
according announcement on all of my ENUM
>
related lists (and there are some! ;-) or did NASK switch over to
> production in absolute silence?
>
> Best,
>
>
-C.
>
>