Re: >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
-
From: Max Tulyev president@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:50:10 +0300
Hi Dmitry!
Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two
domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :(
But hope we can help to move it right way ;)
Dmitriy V Menzulskiy wrote:
>
> Hi Max ! Hi everybody !
>
> Now I understand: people who want to destroy Soviet Union - they still
> want to destroy it comletely :-(((
>
> Maybe, it's time to start CIS TLD ?
>
> WBR,
>
> Dmitry Menzulskiy
>
> ----- Переслано: Dmitriy V Menzulskiy/BeeLine дата: 02.11.2006 13:39 -----
>
> dns-wg-admin@localhost написано 02.11.2006 13:30:47:
>
>> On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 11:34 +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
>> > Doug Barton wrote:
>> > >> This domain grows even it have huge price (
>> > >> http://www.nic.ru/en/index.html ). So people really need it.
>> > >
>> > > A) Wanting something is not the same as needing it.
>> >
>> > The magic is who decides what I need and what I don't need.
>>
>> That you _prefer_ .su doesn't mean that the TLDs it's been split into
>> can't meet your _needs_.
>>
>> preferences != needs
>>
>> >
>> > > B) My feeling is that what you're saying here (substantial
>> > > registration growth in spite of the high price) speaks more to the
>> > > motivations of the SU operators for maintaining their domain than it
>> > > does for the necessity of keeping it in the root.
>> >
>> > Nobody push people to buy .SU domains. Only issue they do it - they need
>> > it. Am I wrong?
>> >
>>
>> Are anybody pushing people to avoid .su? I.e. how much effort are
>> the .su-maintainers putting into convincing people to use the individual
>> ccTLDs instead? ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Per Heldal - http://heldal.eml.cc/
>>
--
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)
|